FG Dismisses ADC’s Criticism Over Ambassadorial Vacancies, Labels It Politically Motivated
By Erewunmi Peace
The Federal Government has strongly rejected recent criticism from the African Democratic Congress (ADC) concerning the current state of Nigeria’s diplomatic representation, particularly the delay in appointing ambassadors to various foreign missions. The government described the opposition party’s remarks as “baseless, alarmist, and politically motivated.”
In a statement released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the FG emphasized that the country’s foreign missions remain functional and are currently being managed by experienced senior diplomats and chargés d’affaires. The statement accused the ADC of spreading misinformation and politicizing a matter of national interest.
“The government finds it necessary to clarify that Nigeria is not unrepresented abroad. Our missions continue to function effectively under capable leadership,” the ministry stated.
The ADC had earlier accused President Bola Tinubu’s administration of neglecting Nigeria’s diplomatic responsibilities following the mass recall of ambassadors in 2023 and the subsequent delay in appointing new envoys. The party claimed the move left Nigeria’s foreign missions “rudderless” and projected a poor image of the country internationally.
But in its response, the FG defended the pace of appointments, explaining that it is part of a broader foreign service reform aimed at prioritizing merit, competence, and national interest over political expediency.
.“This administration is committed to repositioning the foreign service, and ambassadorial appointments will reflect excellence, not political favors,” the statement added.
The ministry also cautioned opposition figures against making inflammatory comments that could undermine the image of the Nigerian foreign service, which it said continues to operate with professionalism and dedication.
Political Reactions
Analysts say the ADC’s statement may reflect growing political tensions ahead of key national events, including upcoming appointments and party realignments. However, the Federal Government’s firm pushback underscores its desire to manage diplomatic affairs free from political pressure.
Observers also note that delays in ambassadorial appointments are not unusual globally, especially when part of institutional restructuring or administrative transitions.
