By Erewunmi Peace

Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Michael Maduabuchi, has clarified that the apology rendered by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan was not directed at the judiciary, but to the Nigerian Senate—particularly to Senate President, Godswill Akpabio.

This clarification comes amidst public discourse and media reports surrounding a recent Federal High Court ruling, which declared the suspension of Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan from plenary sessions unlawful and a breach of her fundamental rights.

Speaking on a televised program, Maduabuchi SAN emphasized the legal and constitutional distinctions between court orders and parliamentary procedures. He explained that the court merely pronounced the suspension as illegal and ordered her reinstatement, but did not mandate an apology to itself.

“The apology is not to the court; it is to the Senate—and especially to Senator Akpabio, in his capacity as the President of the Senate,” he stated.

Senator Natasha’s suspension had drawn widespread attention in recent weeks, especially following her vocal stance on alleged corruption and procedural irregularities within the upper chamber. Her reinstatement, which followed a judicial order, was seen by many as a victory for democratic accountability.

However, the apology sparked debate about separation of powers and the Senate’s internal disciplinary authority. Maduabuchi’s comment sought to temper that conversation by highlighting that the judiciary’s role was limited to enforcing constitutional rights, not managing legislative conduct.

Legal experts and civil society organizations continue to monitor the situation closely, with many calling for clearer guidelines on the limits of legislative discipline in relation to constitutionally protected freedoms.

As of press time, the Senate leadership has not issued an official statement regarding Maduabuchi’s remarks.